Ticket #363 (new enhancement)
Use Speech Recognition Standards like PLS and SSML
| Reported by: | kmaclean | Owned by: | kmaclean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | major | Milestone: | WebSite 0.3 |
| Component: | Acoustic Model | Version: | Website 0.2 |
| Keywords: | Cc: |
Description (last modified by kmaclean) (diff)
Yes, we need to find a solution for the storage of the pronunciation lexicon data. I will take a look at the Pronunciation Lexicon Specification. It is necessary that other people are able to use our work without barriers. And to achieve this goal we may have to look at specifications like Speech Recognition Grammar Specification, VoiceXML, Semantic Interpretation for Speech Recognition. We should try to eliminate any barrier. And this means to employ standards. If we do employ standards we have a chance to become a serious pronunciation resource.
Follow-up from ralf
And I want to say something about #4 "develop things that are important." What things are important? I said it already in a different thread. I would like to encourage ASR/TTS-interested persons to employ VoiceXML related standards. Employ the Pronunciation Lexicon Specification (PLS) for the dictionaries. Would it be legal to make the CMU pronunciation dictionary compatible with the PLS?
